🔗 Share this article

The Australian batsman methodically applies butter on each surface of a slice of white bread. “That’s essential,” he tells the camera as he lowers the lid of his toastie maker. “There you go. Then you get it toasted on both sides.” He opens the grill to reveal a perfectly browned of pure toasted goodness, the melted cheese happily melting inside. “And that’s the key technique,” he explains. At which point, he does something horrific and unspeakable.

By now, you may feel a sense of disinterest is beginning to form across your eyes. The alarm bells of sportswriting pretension are blinking intensely. You’re likely conscious that Labuschagne made 160 runs for Queensland this week and is being eagerly promoted for an return to the Test side before the England-Australia contest.

You likely wish to read more about that. But first – you now realise with an anguished sigh – you’re going to have to sit through several lines of wobbling whimsy about toasties, plus an additional unnecessary part of tiresome meta‑deconstruction in the “you” perspective. You sigh again.

Marnus transfers the sandwich on to a plate and heads over the fridge. “Few try this,” he states, “but I personally prefer the grilled sandwich chilled. Boom, in the fridge. You get that cheese to harden up, go bat, come back. Perfect. Toastie’s ready to go.”

The Cricket Context

Look, to cut to the chase. Shall we get the cricket bit out of the way first? Small reward for making it this far. And while there may be just six weeks until the initial match, Labuschagne’s century against Tasmania – his third of the summer in all cricket – feels significantly impactful.

We have an Aussie opening batsmen clearly missing performance and method, shown up by the Proteas in the World Test Championship final, shown up once more in the Caribbean afterwards. Labuschagne was dropped during that trip, but on some level you sensed Australia were eager to bring him back at the earliest chance. Now he appears to have given them the ideal reason.

This represents a plan that Australia need to work. Usman Khawaja has just one 100 in his last 44 knocks. Konstas looks not quite a first-innings batsman and rather like the handsome actor who might act as a batsman in a Bollywood epic. No other options has presented a strong argument. Nathan McSweeney looks finished. Marcus Harris is still inexplicably hanging around, like moths or damp. Meanwhile their skipper, Cummins, is injured and suddenly this appears as a unusually thin squad, missing command or stability, the kind of natural confidence that has often given Australia a lead before a game starts.

Labuschagne’s Return

Enter Marnus: a world No 1 Test batter as in the recent past, recently omitted from the 50-over squad, the ideal candidate to bring stability to a fragile lineup. And we are told this is a calmer and more meditative Labuschagne currently: a pared-down, back-to-basics Labuschagne, not as intensely fixated with technical minutiae. “I feel like I’ve really simplified things,” he said after his hundred. “Not overthinking, just what I should score runs.”

Naturally, this is doubted. Most likely this is a new approach that exists only in Labuschagne’s personal view: still constantly refining that technique from dawn to dusk, going further toward simplicity than any player has attempted. Like basic approach? Marnus will devote weeks in the practice sessions with trainers and footage, thoroughly reshaping his game into the least technical batter that has ever been seen. This is simply the quality of the focused, and the characteristic that has long made Labuschagne one of the most wildly absorbing sportsmen in the sport.

Bigger Scene

It could be before this inscrutably unpredictable historic rivalry, there is even a sort of pleasing dissonance to Labuschagne’s constant dedication. On England’s side we have a squad for whom technical study, let alone self-analysis, is a risky subject. Go with instinct. Focus on the present. Live in the instant.

On the opposite side you have a batsman like Labuschagne, a individual utterly absorbed with cricket and magnificently unbothered by others’ opinions, who observes cricket even in the gaps in the game, who approaches this quirky game with just the right measure of odd devotion it requires.

And it worked. During his focused era – from the time he walked out to substitute for an injured Steve Smith at the famous ground in 2019 to around the end of 2022 – Labuschagne found a way to see the game with greater insight. To access it – through sheer intensity of will – on a elevated, strange, passionate tier. During his stint in club cricket, teammates would find him on the day of a match positioned on a seat in a focused mindset, mentally rehearsing every single ball of his time at the crease. Per the analytics firm, during the first few years of his career a unusually large number of chances were spilled from his batting. Remarkably Labuschagne had predicted events before anyone had a chance to affect it.

Recent Challenges

It’s possible this was why his career began to disintegrate the point he became number one. There were no further goals to picture, just a unknown territory before his eyes. Furthermore – he began doubting his signature shot, got trapped on the crease and seemed to misjudge his positioning. But it’s all the same thing. Meanwhile his trainer, Neil D’Costa, thinks a focus on white-ball cricket started to erode confidence in his positioning. Positive development: he’s recently omitted from the one-day team.

No doubt it’s important, too, that Labuschagne is a man of deep religious faith, an religious believer who holds that this is all predetermined, who thus sees his task as one of accessing this state of flow, no matter how mysterious it may seem to the ordinary people.

This approach, to my mind, has long been the key distinction between him and Steve Smith, a instinctive player