🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."